Penjihad's Blog

"To comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable"

About

Blogger Jafar “Jeff” Siddiqui is an American Muslim living in WA.. USA. 

He grew up in the Khyber Pukhtunkhwa (North-West Frontier) Province and has maintained close contacts in Pakistan.

He is a member of American Muslims of Puget Sound and is a human rights activist. He is involved with movements for inter-faith understanding. He has contributed articles for a textbook on terrorism, used by US law-enforcement agencies. He has also presented discussions and written article, on the Indo-Pakistan hostilities and their impact on Afghanistan.; he writes articles and gives lectures on Civil Rights, American Foreign Policy, on Islam, on current affairs including events in the Middle East, South and Central Asia. His works have been published in various print media. He also gives commentaries on radio and TV on these subjects.

******************************************************************************************************************

Dare I say “Jihad”?

Occasionally, I use the term “Jihad” in my articles, as the action needed to help make changes to better the ills of society. I often get feedback in which people worry more about my use of the word “Jihad”, than they do about the injustice about which I wrote; some wonder why I would use such a charged word among non-Muslims.

I intentionally use “Jihad”, because I want to jolt Muslims AND non-Muslims; “Jihad”  cannot and must not become de-legitimized just because some people do not care to understand the true meaning of a sacred term and decide to associate it with terrible things.

“Jihad” springs from the Arabic “Jhd” which means “struggle”; “Jihad”  means the act of struggle, “Mujahid” (Plural, Mujahideen) is someone who is doing “Jihad”.

At the core (the highest level), it is the duty of every Muslim to struggle against the basic negative predispositions we all have as humans…greed, envy, jealousy, rage, deceit, theft, murder etc.

At the next level, it is the duty of every Muslim to fight against the ills that beset Mankind…hunger, disease, homelessness, illiteracy, injustice, lack of water, pollution etc.,

At the least important level, Muslims are required to fight those who attack us AFTER we have exhausted all other efforts towards peaceful resolution. Even then, if peace is at hand, even at mid-battle, one has to stop and accept terms that are just and preserve the dignity of all parties.

I would imagine these are things that every person needs to subscribe to, not just Muslims.

Yet, there is a growing body of opinion in the non-Muslim West, that “Jihad” can ONLY be equated with murder and mayhem and thus, anyone using the word, can be presumed to be associated with supporting murder and mayhem.

I would suggest that supporters of the body of opinion that would like to taint “Jihad”, are people who consider themselves at “War!” with Islam, Muslims and Arabs. They may be a growing number of people, but they are wrong and it would be wrong for Muslims to lend credence to this opinion by shying away from “Jihad” in word, or in action.

Not so long ago, the Jewish organization ADL, launched an attack on some Muslim groups because the Muslims were wearing the Muslim Affirmation… “Shehada” (“There is no God but one God, and Mohammed is His prophet”) on their headbands and the ADL said that the Shehada stood for terrorism.

There are a growing number of bigots who state that Islam’s holy book, the Quran, is a symbol of evil and violence.

What should Muslims do? Abandon the Shehada and the Quran?

Some may say that we should just not use the Shehada on headbands, why not? Either the Affirmation (Shahada) is sacred or it is not; if it is sacred, then wherever it is used, as long as the use is not profane, is also sacred. If the Shehada is used in a profane manner, then the reflection is not upon the Shehada, but on the abuser.

Hitler took the Swastika as his symbol and today, it strikes fear and revulsion in the hearts of many, especially Jews. However, the Swastika is thousands of years old and among Hindus, the “Savas Tika” (“Peace sign”) is a holy symbol, it is used to adorn temples and used by Hindus at almost every occasion…it can be clockwise or counter-clockwise.

Should the Hindus be asked to abandon the Savas tika as a symbol?

If we dared to make such an absurd demand, we would be laughed off the stage.

The Star of David strikes fear and revulsion among millions of Palestinian men, women and children; should the Jews be asked to abandon the Star of David as their symbol?

I am betting millions of Bosnian Muslims shudder a little when they see a Crucifix, or the Christian Orthodox cross, because of the genocide of Bosnian Muslims by the Serbs and the Croats in the name of Christianity in the 1990s; should those symbols be cast aside?

The principle of “use it or lose it” is quite valid here. If we retreat for any reason, we are acknowledging that our sacred and holy terms or symbols are sometimes themselves, evil. Once we give that ground, then we can no longer use our Savas Tikas, our Crucifixes or our terms…THEN, the bad guys have truly won.

I believe that as reasoned and rational people, we cannot allow ourselves to fall victim to populist bigotries. We must look at what the symbol actually stands for, rather than associate it with the negative events that were tied to it by evil people; we must be able to differentiate between Nazi Swastikas on one hand, and symbols and words that are sacred, on the other.

Jihad; it is a sacred duty for every Muslim, Christian, Jew, Hindu…for every human being of good will.

11 Comments »

  1. Saved as a favorite, I really like your blog!

    Comment by Online Security | September 18, 2011 | Reply

  2. Useful website. Thanks for sharing.

    Comment by The Blues | September 20, 2011 | Reply

  3. Simply wish to say your article is as astounding. The clearness on your post is just excellent and i could think you are a professional in this subject. Fine along with your permission allow me to take hold of your feed to stay up to date with imminent post. Thank you one million and please continue the gratifying work.

    Comment by Lauryn Srour | September 20, 2011 | Reply

  4. Thank you for sharing excellent informations. Your site is very cool. I am impressed by the details that you have on this web site. It reveals how nicely you perceive this subject. Bookmarked this web page, will come back for more articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found simply the info I already searched everywhere and just could not come across. What an ideal web-site.

    Comment by Seymour Res | September 20, 2011 | Reply

  5. Greetings from Australia. You helped me with my university assignment. Thank so much.

    Comment by Aussie Psych Student | September 27, 2011 | Reply

  6. A lot of of the commentary on this particular blog page dont make sense.

    Comment by http://www.reddit.com | May 4, 2012 | Reply

  7. Jihad is necessary for peace in world
    http://www.preachingofislam.blogspot.com

    Comment by hafizmansoor313 | January 30, 2014 | Reply

    • In my opinion, it is a mistake to bring one’s thoughts down to a slogan such as “Islam is a religion of Peace” or, “Jihad is necessary for Peace in the world” because they mean nothing and they mean everything. Take the time to explain what you mean because your readers do not know whether you mean war when you say “Jihad” or you mean the peaceful, quiet struggle for peace and justice. If you use short catchphrases, people WILL twist your meanings into something you did not mean.

      Comment by penjihad | February 20, 2014 | Reply

  8. May Peace be upon you.

    Jihad / Jahad

    Is n’t actually the word “jihad” used wrongly in the western media? Don’t they mean “jAhad”?

    “isn’t “jihad” the (hard) struggle with ourselves?

    Why should the western media use the wrong word for something so noble as “jihad”?

    Comment by Herman4394 | June 17, 2014 | Reply

    • Wa alaikum assalam. I am not aware of the disctinction between the two that you present, I believe they are simply the same word pronounced differently, “Jahad” being a drwawled-out way of sayin “Jihad”, which is NOT pronounced “Jee-HAAD” as it is in the West, but “Jehaad”…the ‘e’ being pronounce like the ‘e’ in “deck”. Western medis continue to misrepresent the term.

      Comment by penjihad | June 17, 2014 | Reply

  9. Thank you very much Penjihad.

    So, may be unfortunately I’m wrongly informed. But I had this question already many years and that is the answer I got here in Malaysia and also in Egypt.
    But I am afraid a further search on search engines on the internet is not very wise, because of all the spying by NSA etc.

    I will keep searching, but I like your courage mentioning these thoughts openly. Finally somebody like you… taking your time to search, to explain. Let’s keep each other informed.

    Comment by Herman4394 | June 17, 2014 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 42 other followers

%d bloggers like this: